@ahopkins wrote:
@pgjones Awesome! Thanks for the heads up. I made a separate branch on my local last night to start playing with #1265 and generating some tests for it. If you have any tripping points or gotchas in mind, that would be great.
The more I think about this, the more I think this is the way to go. My hesitancy has been the requirement of another package in the stack to get up and running, but I think is a common enough practice using (for example) gunicorn with other frameworks in the Python world that it’s not a burden.
