@vltr wrote:
HTTP/2 would be huge for Sanic. But, not only should we take a look at the #472 issue you mentioned, but also for this particular issue from @tomchristie, regarding support for ASGI - which also implements HTTP/2 out of the box.
@vltr wrote:
HTTP/2 would be huge for Sanic. But, not only should we take a look at the #472 issue you mentioned, but also for this particular issue from @tomchristie, regarding support for ASGI - which also implements HTTP/2 out of the box.